Showing posts with label Reading First. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reading First. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Why Kids Still Cannot Read

If you want our children to do better in school, then it is important to begin to understand the reasons why they are not. In researching the various trends and strategies in education, everyone, including educators and parents alike, can communicate more effectively about the issues.

One issue I read about is the fact that during the couple of decades new views of reading instruction emerged and morphed in school districts nationwide. The issue now isn't whether phonics or whole language methods are better for beginning readers, but how to blend these reading programs tailored each individual child.

It was known as "the reading wars," waged during the 1980s and '90s. It was around 1987 when apparently, personal journals became one of the latest classroom tactics for teaching kids to read. Defined as whole language, it was an instructional philosophy emphasizing that children focus on meaning, which contrasts with phonics based methods of teaching reading and writing - with an emphasis in instruction for reading and spelling.

At that time, many people believe that children were poor readers because the old skills-based approach that emphasized phonics. The fact that memorization ended up turning reading into a chore, thus alienating them from reading at all.

But ultimately whole language proved to be a disaster when applied to real kids and teachers. Eight years after whole language first appeared in California grade schools, by the mid-90s, fourth-grader reading scores had plummeted to near the bottom nationally, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP).

It was in 1997 when Congress formed the National Reading Panel to evaluate the research on teaching practices to determine what really works. Thereafter, the federal No Child Left Behind Act required that school districts use scientifically proven instructional methods as they strive to make all children proficient in math and reading by 2014.

Today there is a trend towards balanced or comprehensive literacy. Most educators agree that there is no one program that fits all children for learning to read.

This makes sense insofar as what I have experienced with our Children of the City programs such as Create Success, an after school and summer program with a high priority on individual students and their academic success with intense tutoring to improve each child's reading and math levels. I think that if more communities in the United States had programs like this, our kids would learn to read much faster.

One student that has been helped tremendously through this program, is a second grade boy named Weixum. His favorite topic is about dinosaurs, and he now reads books that are way above the standard reading level of a second grader, and he does fine interpreting the text. Why? He sounds out the harder Latin based words. You would never guess that Weixum does not speak English at home. His teacher initially referred him to Children of the City’s Create Success for help with his homework and reading.

To learn more about my involvement in this and other charities, please go to my charity website known as http://www.roccobasile.org/ where I continue to list facts, trends and success stories.

Friday, May 2, 2008

Reading First Program for Low Income Children Did Not Work

News just out yesterday from the Department of Education on the latest report issued by its Institute of Education Sciences -- President Bush’s $1 billion a year initiative to teach reading to low-income children has not helped improve their reading comprehension. The report entitled, "Reading First Impact Study: Interim Report" was mandated by Congress.

Bush's "Reading First" program was reportedly based on some of his educational experiences as Texas governor. But the report states that so far this program did not improve the students' reading comprehension. President Bush and Secretary Margaret Spellings have continued to tout the program's success, however last year the Congressional Democrats did reduce the financing of this project from $1 billion down to $400 million for this year of 2008.

This news is not good. And all the more reason to take a look at non-profit organizations that can assist our youth with their educational concerns. As you know, my own education website has information about education at http://www.roccobasile.org/, and specifically about the Children of the City programs that are helping kids by personally fostering strong relationships. The group teaches, informs and counsels on various life issues and skills through programs such as: Strong Minds and Strong Homes: a volunteer effort that meets children and families in Southwest Brooklyn and connects them with the services they may not know about. Plus the Create Success After School and Summer Program places a high priority on intense tutoring and daily personal homework help. We have already seen dramatic increases in student’s reading and math levels, healthy study habits, communications, improved peer relationships, and more. Click here to learn more about this program.

Meanwhile, the Reading First study analyzed the student's performance from 12 states in the first to third grades during the 2004-5 and 2005-6 school years. The final report will follow early in 2009 and will analyze additional follow-up data.The report is available at: http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/index.html

Directly from the report: "The ability to read and comprehend text well is at the heart of educational attainment and, as such, is central to all children’s elementary school success. Unfortunately, success in elementary school (and beyond) disproportionately eludes many minority and economically disadvantaged children. Large numbers of minority children, often in high-poverty schools, are not developing the reading skills needed for success in school. Results from the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading Assessment indicate that 54 percent of fourth-grade students eligible for free or reduced-price lunches read at a Below Basic level compared to only 23 percent of fourth-graders not eligible for free or reduced-price lunches who perform at that level.8 Although these results are disappointing, these findings are an improvement over the 2000 NAEP results where 62 percent of students eligible free or reduced price lunches scored at the Below Basic level (U.S. Department of Education, 2005)."